Brexit: EU to have power to punish UK at will during transition
Brussels will have the power to punish the UK
at will during the Brexit transition period by closing off parts of
the single market to British companies, according to a leaked legal document
drawn up by the EU.
The 27 remaining member states want to be able to act
against the UK without having to go through the potentially lengthy process of
bringing cases to the European court of Justice, should Brussels come to the
judgment that Britain has infringed EU law.
The use of focused sanctions to “suspend
certain benefits ... of the internal market”, would give the EU the freedom to
punish the UK without prematurely terminating the transition period and risking
damage to its economic interests.
Sanctions the EU could feasibly impose include
tariffs on goods, the enforcement of customs checks or the suspension of the
single air aviation agreement, which gives UK carriers the right to fly between
Britain and the continent.
The document does not stipulate what acts by
the UK would lead to sanctions, but the EU has made it clear it is concerned
that the British government could infringe the rights of its nationals living in the UK
after Brexit.
The development will inevitably fuel the
concerns held by some over the terms of the 21-month transition period
following Brexit day on 29 March 2019, during which
the UK will effectively stay in the single market and customs union without any
say on new regulations.
Theresa May’s apparent acceptance of most
of the EU’s demands has already prompted
accusations from the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg that the UK will be a “vassal state”.
The EU’s leaked position paper, entitled
Transitional Arrangements in the Withdrawal Agreement, lays out in legal
language the EU’s terms for the transition period, including its insistence
that British officials and politicians will play no role in decision-making
institutions after 29 March 2019.
The document says that only in exceptional
cases will the UK be allowed to sit in on parts of meetings.
Even then, British officials will have to
leave the room once the relevant part of discussions have come to an end. “The
chair of the meeting concerned shall clearly identify the agenda points for
which their attendance is allowed,” the document notes. The UK will also be blocked
from having access to “sensitive information”.
The document states that the UK will merely be
“consulted” on fishing in its waters during the
transition period, in a clear indication of the EU’s intention that the current
quotas will remain in force.
The demand for a “mechanism” to punish the UK
where it is thought to have infringed EU law during the transition period is
likely to cause the most consternation among Reciters.
The demand is contained in the final footnote
in the document, which is to form the centerpiece of this week’s EU-UK
negotiations in Brussels.
It states the future withdrawal agreement “should
provide for a mechanism allowing the union to suspend certain benefits deriving
for the United Kingdom from participation in the internal market where it
considers that referring the matter to the court of justice of the European
Union would not bring in appropriate time the necessary
remedies”.
The two most contentious issues, until now,
were thought to be the UK’s lack of a veto in the application of sensitive new
laws and May’s insistence that EU nationals arriving in the UK during the
transition period will be treated differently to those who are already in the
country.
Officials from the UK and the EU will engage
in four days of talks, beginning on Tuesday, led by the most senior officials
from each side, Sabine Weyand, the bloc’s deputy chief negotiator, and Downing
Street’s senior Brexit adviser, Olly Robbins.
A UK government spokesperson said: “This is a
draft document produced by the EU that simply reflects their stated directives.
The secretary of state set out the UK’s position in his speech in Teesside last
month.
“Together these provide a solid foundation for
the negotiations on the implementation period which have begun this week with
the aim of reaching agreement by March’s European council meeting.”
Comments
Post a Comment