US equity investment, hedging method to overcome high-value phobia
US shares that had kept
historic highs prices falling back as a result of a rise in long-term interest
rates (2.85% on 10-year US Treasury rates, closing on 2 February), nervous
development .
The drop is only 4.1% from the high in January at the Dow and
3.8% at the S & P 500 as well, but it seems that it has felt a bit cold
water as the steady trend without turbulence lasted long. Is it a good
opportunity to buy a bargain with the beginning of a full-fledged adjustment /
declining phase or a temporary small decline? No one really knows such
short term expectations.
The investment attitude that depends on short-term expectations
that are out of order is unstable and not rewarded in the long run. Rather,
it seems that the phase of risk hedging began to arrive in a general view and
reviewing the portfolio ratio of US stocks and long-term bonds.
The rise in long-term interest rates, which is the cause of
current stock price declines, also provides effective hedging opportunities for
future US stock declines. Consider this point including the risk hedge of
the dollar exchange rate.
Effective risk hedging is possible
In terms of the US economic upswing in 2018 and corporate profit
growth expectations, the stock price index (PER, based on the latest 12-month
account settlement report) is 25.8 in terms of stock index S & P 500,
10-year average per-share In the Schiller PER (CAPE ratio) based on net income
33.4 (both as of February 2) has soared. The level of Schiller PER, which
peaked at the peak of the IT bubble, reached a historically high 50.2 in
December 1999, but the current level is the second highest.
For those who are not experienced in investment, it seems that
there are not many people who think that "It would be good to sell it if
it looks down at the chart etc., but if it goes down," it is difficult for
those who have a long investment experience. There are many people who
sell it as though the raise trend is over and lose profits from the subsequent
long succession.
However, while using reasonable hedging (risk aversion)
measures, it is possible to improve long-term returns while mitigating risk of
declining. Indeed, it is one of such inventions that diversified investment
which became obvious today, or an index investment fund itself which makes it
easy to use it.
However, even with index investment (dollar basis) linked with S
& P 500, there are ten declining phases when it comes down from the
economic recovery period back to the year 1950 to see how the stock index fell
during the economic recession period.
Although it did not become a
recession, there were two times that a decline of more than 30% occurred (1987
and 2002) (Reference column: “Consider
the next US recession and the room to fall stock price "
2018 1 Monday 10). The average decline rate from these 12 most recent
highs is 31.2%, the maximum decline rate is 57.7% (2007 - 09), and the minimum
is 14% (1959 - 60 years).
The annual return of S & P 500 after 1950 (based on dividend
reinvestment) is really high at 9.6%. However, if we cannot tolerate a
decline in stock price of more than 30%, which is occurring twelve times since
1950, we cannot acquire that high return.
Moreover, next time in the US recession, the risk appreciation
of the worldwide investors will likely lead to the appreciation of the yen
again. Therefore, if Japanese investors invest in yen funds, considering
the dollar's decline in the yen against the yen, there is a high possibility
that the decline rate of the yen base of the US stock will not be about 30%.
Long-term bonds in the United States are effective in
alleviating portfolio risk by making inverse correlation with US stock
declines. For institutional investors who have a portfolio diversified in
domestic and foreign stocks and bonds in Japan, this is aware of, but it is
wisdom that has not taken root in Japanese investors why.
The chart shows the trend of market value assets in the case of
holding both 50% each of both ETF (IVV) linked with S & P 500 and ETF (IEF)
linked with long-term US Treasury (7 - 10 year), respectively (Both dividends ·
interest reinvestment, dollar basis). In the S & P 500 only portfolio,
the annualized return is high at 9.8%, but it has declined by about 51% from
the 2007 to 2009 bottom price.
There
are not many people who can bear with ease by reducing the value of their
portfolio by half. As a result, many people are unable to make additional
investment despite being a stock buyer of a thousand in stock market during the
recession, in the worst case they will cease investment.
However, long-term US bond-linked ETFs have increased
approximately 30% in value in nearly the same period. It is because
monetary easing raised long-term bond prices (yields plummeted). As a
result, in the portfolio holding 50% of both sides from the start of the ETF in
July 2002, the decrease in value at the same time is relaxed to 23%.
High performance in the synthesis of US stocks and US
long-term bonds
Annualized returns and risks (annualized standard deviation) of
the three cases are as indicated on the chart. Risk here is the standard
deviation of annualized conversion of the monthly change in asset value. For
the sake of clarity, for example, the risk of 10% means that the probability of
falling within the range of 10% above and below as a one year variation is
about two thirds.
Investment performance is generally indicated by a Sharpe ratio
that divides annual return by risk. The composite portfolio of stocks and
long-term debt 50: 50 is the highest among these three, and it can be said that
it is high performance. The reason is that the price of stocks and
long-term bonds tends to move with an inverse correlation, so the fluctuation
of the portfolio is alleviated by the amount of movement that goes against, and
the risk is reduced.
However, if long-term bonds are purchased at a time when the
yield is still low, the return will also reduce the hedging effect. Therefore,
how much money to incorporate long-term bonds into the portfolio is the skill
of hedging, as monetary policy is tightened in the latter stage of the economic
recovery and yields of long-term bonds are as high as possible?
In my own experience, when the ten-year US Treasury yield was
more than 5% in the autumn of 2006, we held 10-year zero coupon bonds with US
shares (S & P 500 ETF) at a ratio of 6: 4 60%), so we were able to ease the
valuation loss on shares at the time of Lehman shock.
Even against the sharp appreciation of the yen and the dollar at
that time, we maintained a 90% hedge rate at the dollar selling holding of FX trades,
so we did not get shaken. After the bond became maturity redemption, the
US long-term bond yield was judged to be too low and he did not possess it. However,
from the level of around 3% on the 10-year yield, I will try to split up and
start buying again.
However, when you purchase in-kind bonds, the time to redemption
becomes shorter with the passage of time. As a result, price fluctuations
for a 1% yield change gradually become smaller, so you have to replace them
yourself. In that respect, "iShares Core US Treasury 7 - 10 Year ETF
(1656)" listed on the TSE since last year will be replaced by the fund
operator so that it operates in 7 - 10 years, so here it looks good to buy.
How far will the 10-year US Treasury yield go up by the next
recession? Perhaps it is at most 3% to 4%. Although not as much as
Japan, the US economy has also experienced a structural change after the Lehman
shock, and there is a strong tendency not to raise inflation rate and wage
growth rate.
Even with the economic upsides expected from this year to
next year, the probability that the 10-year US Treasury yield will rise to
around 5%, which is the peak before the Lehman shock, will be very low.
Why is the appreciation of the yen despite expansion of
interest differential between Japan and the US>?
The hedge of foreign exchange loss arising in the yen
appreciation and the dollar depreciation that will occur again in the recession
of the United States is a major factor affecting investment performance as a
Japanese investor.
First of all, despite expectations for the upswing in
the US economy after the establishment of a tranche of the cards in January
this year and the accompanying rise in the long-term interest rate of the
dollar (expansion of the difference in the US and US interest rates), the yen
appreciation up to the 108 yen level advanced How do you understand paradoxical
circumstances?
It seems that there are many people who are twisting their
heads, but the extent to which macro new variables, macroeconomic variables in
economic and monetary terms influence the market will depend on the gradual
inclination of market participants at that time considering that it depends, it
is not so strange.
For example, when the market participants' gross domestic
expectation of yen depreciation is large and the yen has declined to the yen
selling holding, and the yen also depressed, the news suggesting a fall in the
yen and the change in economic and financial
Even if it happens, the yen's
value will often not decline so much. Rather, it is even possible for the
yen to rise due to the rewinding of existing holdings. On the contrary,
after the yen appreciates, if similar yen depreciation occurs, the market
responds sensitively and a sharp depreciation of the yen occurs.
Let's rewind a little time and look back. Early in 2016,
even after three years from the start of avionics, the rate of increase in
consumer prices did not reach 2% of the policy target, even it was even lower
than the same month the previous year.
As a result, the yen's appreciation
rapidly jumped from 120 dollars per dollar to 99 thousand yen due to the shift
to Japanese yen price hike = yen buying holding, existing handover of yen
selling holdings maintained by hope of yen depreciation Progressed.
The introduction of the negative interest rate announced in
January 2016 by the BOJ did not bring about a weaker yen effect. This is
probably because the existing holdings of market participants are inclined to
yen selling overall, losing confidence in sustaining its yen selling holdings,
and rewinding the yen (yen buying back) process.
Thereafter, from the time immediately before the US presidential
election in November 2016, if the winner of the cards won, a large tax cut of
his pledge and investment of massive infrastructure will occur, the US economy
will rise, the long-term interest rate will rise as well Market participants
began thinking seriously.
And with Mr. Trump’s victory, the long - term
interest rate appreciated at a stretch, the dollar appreciated and the yen
weakened. (Reference column: "The trump market is still a prologue, the shock of a large tax cut "
November 21, 2016)
The point to note here is that the long-term interest rate differential
between Japan and the US and the change in the dollar exchange rate were almost
uncorrelated until the summer of 2016.
However, since the beginning of
2016, the existing holdings of market participants have already turned to yen
buying, and the yen has appreciated. As a result, there was a
hypersensitive response to the financial situation change unfavorable to the
yen buying position of expansion of the difference between the US and the US
interest rates, which was the rewinding of the yen buying holding, that is, yen
selling, and in December of the same year the yen's depreciation Progressed.
Of course, there is no real-time data showing the gradient of
the overall market exchange in the market, for example non-commercial muscle
futures of Chicago IMM represents the slope of exchange gains around the world
as "a corner of the iceberg" It is considered to be. What I have
stated is consistent with the change in the Chicago IMM's holdings.
<Hedging to the depreciation of the yen against the dollar in
the medium term is indispensable>
Considering this, I can understand the fact that the yen
appreciated instead of the depreciated yen despite the rise in long-term
interest rates in the US dollar in January (expansion of Japan-US interest
spread disparity) as follows.
That is, with the rapid progress of the euro / dollar
depreciation, in which the existing participants' existing holdings tend to be
quite yen-selling, and the Eurozone’s economic boom improved, the market
participants bought dollars against the yen I was losing confidence in
sustaining high.
As a result, the dollar long-term interest rate rise did
not cause new dollar buying and yen selling, and on the contrary, the rewinding
of existing yen selling holdings (yen buying) occurred.
Although there are comments emphasizing the possibility of the
BOJ's policy change as a reason for the movement towards the yen's
appreciation, it is only a truly weak yen-high material compared to the dollar
long-term interest rate that actually progressed.
In short, when existing
holdings tilt in one direction, and market participants are beginning to feel
uneasy about their continuation, it is only that there is a hypersensitive
market reaction of "waterfowl feathers are also so-called enemy
attacks".
The medium-term stance on my dollar exchange rate has not
changed from the September column last September column "The yen appreciation suggested by the real dollar exchange rate "
(September 12, 2017).
Looking at the dollar exchange rate since 1973,
there are 6 mountains of the dollar (yen weak) with the real exchange rate
greatly deviating from the tipping average, 5 times the valley of the dollar
weak (yen appreciation) Have judged that the final phase of the wave of the
sixth dollar high is starting.
In the next recession of the United States again, the yen
appreciation of 90 yen per dollar, 80 yen level would be a natural result. However,
as I wrote in the column in January, there is still more than a year
before the next recession in the US begins, so there is still room for a rise
in US 10-year government bond yields,
The possibility of high · dollar
depreciation will still be low. Therefore, for investors who are not able
to hedge against yen / dollar depreciation due to futures reservations or FX
trades, perhaps one year or so may be the last chance of hedging dollar
selling.
Comments
Post a Comment